{"id":382,"date":"2025-08-26T11:42:33","date_gmt":"2025-08-26T11:42:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/?p=382"},"modified":"2025-08-26T11:48:12","modified_gmt":"2025-08-26T11:48:12","slug":"ai-driven-plagiarism-detection-effects-on-gpa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/ai-driven-plagiarism-detection-effects-on-gpa\/","title":{"rendered":"AI\u2011Driven Plagiarism Detection Effects On GPA (2025)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html lang=\"en\">\n<head>\n    <meta charset=\"UTF-8\">\n    <meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0\">\n    <style>\n               \n               \n        h2 {\n            color: #34495e;\n            margin-top: 35px;\n            margin-bottom: 15px;\n            border-left: 4px solid #3498db;\n            padding-left: 15px;\n        }\n        \n        h3 {\n            color: #4a5568;\n            margin-top: 25px;\n            margin-bottom: 10px;\n            cursor: pointer;\n            padding: 10px;\n            border: 1px solid #e2e8f0;\n            border-radius: 5px;\n            background-color: #f8f9fa;\n        }\n        \n        h3:hover {\n            background-color: #e9ecef;\n        }\n        \n        .chart-container {\n            margin: 30px 0;\n            background-color: white;\n            border: 1px solid #e2e8f0;\n            border-radius: 8px;\n            padding: 20px;\n            box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);\n        }\n        \n        .stats-grid {\n            display: grid;\n            grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(250px, 1fr));\n            gap: 20px;\n            margin: 25px 0;\n        }\n        \n        .stat-card {\n            background-color: white;\n            border: 1px solid #e2e8f0;\n            border-radius: 8px;\n            padding: 20px;\n            text-align: center;\n            box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);\n        }\n        \n        .stat-number {\n            font-size: 2.5em;\n            font-weight: bold;\n            color: #3498db;\n            margin-bottom: 10px;\n        }\n        \n        .stat-label {\n            color: #7f8c8d;\n            font-size: 0.9em;\n        }\n        \n        .comparison-table {\n            width: 100%;\n            border-collapse: collapse;\n            margin: 25px 0;\n            background-color: white;\n            box-shadow: 0 2px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.1);\n        }\n        \n        .comparison-table th,\n        .comparison-table td {\n            border: 1px solid #ddd;\n            padding: 12px;\n            text-align: left;\n        }\n        \n        .comparison-table th {\n            background-color: #f8f9fa;\n            color: #2c3e50;\n            font-weight: 600;\n        }\n        \n        .comparison-table tr:nth-child(even) {\n            background-color: #f8f9fa;\n        }\n        \n        .faq-content {\n            display: none;\n            padding: 15px;\n            background-color: white;\n            border: 1px solid #e2e8f0;\n            border-top: none;\n            border-radius: 0 0 5px 5px;\n            margin-bottom: 10px;\n        }\n        \n        .faq-content.active {\n            display: block;\n        }\n        \n        .internal-link {\n            color: #3498db;\n            text-decoration: none;\n            font-weight: 500;\n        }\n        \n        .internal-link:hover {\n            text-decoration: underline;\n        }\n        \n        .citation {\n            font-size: 0.9em;\n            color: #7f8c8d;\n            border-left: 3px solid #3498db;\n            padding-left: 15px;\n            margin: 20px 0;\n            background-color: #f8f9fa;\n            padding: 15px;\n            border-radius: 5px;\n        }\n        \n        .citation h3 {\n            color: #2c3e50;\n            margin-top: 0;\n            border: none;\n            background: none;\n            padding: 0;\n            cursor: default;\n        }\n        \n        .citation a {\n            color: #3498db;\n            text-decoration: none;\n        }\n        \n        .citation a:hover {\n            text-decoration: underline;\n        }\n        \n        canvas {\n            max-width: 100%;\n            height: auto;\n        }\n        \n        .insight-box {\n            background-color: #f8f9fa;\n            border-left: 4px solid #17a2b8;\n            padding: 15px;\n            margin: 20px 0;\n            border-radius: 0 5px 5px 0;\n        }\n        \n        .warning-box {\n            background-color: #fff3cd;\n            border-left: 4px solid #ffc107;\n            padding: 15px;\n            margin: 20px 0;\n            border-radius: 0 5px 5px 0;\n        }\n    <\/style>\n    <script src=\"https:\/\/cdnjs.cloudflare.com\/ajax\/libs\/Chart.js\/3.9.1\/chart.min.js\"><\/script>\n<\/head>\n<body>\n    <div class=\"container\">\n        \n        <p>The widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Claude in academic settings has triggered an unprecedented surge in AI-generated content submissions. This transformation has prompted educational institutions worldwide to deploy sophisticated AI-powered plagiarism detection systems, fundamentally altering how academic integrity is monitored and maintained.<\/p>\n        \n        <p>This comprehensive analysis examines the measurable impact of AI-driven plagiarism detection on student academic performance, drawing from verified research studies, institutional data, and peer-reviewed sources published in 2024 and 2025.<\/p>\n\n        <h2>Current State of AI Usage in Academic Settings<\/h2>\n        \n        <div class=\"stats-grid\">\n            <div class=\"stat-card\">\n                <div class=\"stat-number\">68%<\/div>\n                <div class=\"stat-label\">Teachers now use AI detection tools<\/div>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"stat-card\">\n                <div class=\"stat-number\">56%<\/div>\n                <div class=\"stat-label\">College students have used AI on assignments<\/div>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"stat-card\">\n                <div class=\"stat-number\">89%<\/div>\n                <div class=\"stat-label\">Students admit to using ChatGPT for homework<\/div>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"stat-card\">\n                <div class=\"stat-number\">10%<\/div>\n                <div class=\"stat-label\">Assignments show some AI use detected<\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <h2>The Academic Performance Impact<\/h2>\n        \n        <div class=\"warning-box\">\n            <strong>Key Finding:<\/strong> Students using generative AI tools score an average of 6.71 points lower (on a 100-point scale) than non-users, according to research published in Economic Sciences.\n        <\/div>\n\n        <div class=\"chart-container\">\n            <h3>GPA Impact of AI Usage vs Non-Usage<\/h3>\n            <canvas id=\"gpaImpactChart\" width=\"400\" height=\"200\"><\/canvas>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <p>The research demonstrates that while generative AI tools may offer perceived benefits for learning efficiency, their actual usage patterns correlate with diminished academic outcomes. This effect proves particularly detrimental to <a href=\"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/study-hours-vs-gpa\/\" class=\"internal-link\">students with high learning potential<\/a>, suggesting that AI tool dependency may hinder natural learning processes.<\/p>\n\n        <h2>Detection Tool Effectiveness and Accuracy<\/h2>\n\n        <p>AI detection tools vary significantly in their accuracy rates and false-positive identification. Understanding these variations is crucial for both educators and students navigating the current academic landscape.<\/p>\n\n        <div class=\"chart-container\">\n            <h3>AI Detection Tool Accuracy Comparison<\/h3>\n            <canvas id=\"accuracyChart\" width=\"400\" height=\"200\"><\/canvas>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <table class=\"comparison-table\">\n            <thead>\n                <tr>\n                    <th>Detection Tool<\/th>\n                    <th>Claimed Accuracy<\/th>\n                    <th>False Positive Rate<\/th>\n                    <th>Key Strengths<\/th>\n                    <th>Notable Limitations<\/th>\n                <\/tr>\n            <\/thead>\n            <tbody>\n                <tr>\n                    <td>Copyleaks<\/td>\n                    <td>99%<\/td>\n                    <td>0.2% (claimed)<\/td>\n                    <td>High accuracy, code detection<\/td>\n                    <td>Premium pricing for advanced features<\/td>\n                <\/tr>\n                <tr>\n                    <td>Turnitin<\/td>\n                    <td>98%<\/td>\n                    <td>Variable (1-50%)<\/td>\n                    <td>Institutional integration<\/td>\n                    <td>Inconsistent independent test results<\/td>\n                <\/tr>\n                <tr>\n                    <td>GPTZero<\/td>\n                    <td>99%<\/td>\n                    <td>1-2%<\/td>\n                    <td>Consistent performance<\/td>\n                    <td>Limited mixed content detection<\/td>\n                <\/tr>\n                <tr>\n                    <td>Originality.AI<\/td>\n                    <td>98.2%<\/td>\n                    <td>Variable<\/td>\n                    <td>Content creator focused<\/td>\n                    <td>Smaller database coverage<\/td>\n                <\/tr>\n            <\/tbody>\n        <\/table>\n\n        <h2>Bias and Equity Concerns in Detection Systems<\/h2>\n\n        <div class=\"insight-box\">\n            <strong>Critical Issue:<\/strong> AI detection tools demonstrate significant bias against non-native English speakers, with false-positive rates reaching 61.3% compared to 7-20% for native speakers.\n        <\/div>\n\n        <p>This disparity raises serious equity concerns in academic settings, particularly affecting international students and those from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Educational institutions must consider these biases when implementing detection policies to ensure fair treatment across all student populations.<\/p>\n\n        <h2>Regional and Institutional Variations<\/h2>\n\n        <div class=\"chart-container\">\n            <h3>AI-Related Academic Misconduct by Institution Type<\/h3>\n            <canvas id=\"institutionChart\" width=\"400\" height=\"200\"><\/canvas>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <p>Different educational environments show varying rates of AI-related academic misconduct. Charter high schools report the highest incidents at 24.11%, while private institutions show lower rates at 6.44%. This variation often correlates with <a href=\"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/public-vs-private-institution-averages\/\" class=\"internal-link\">institutional policies and enforcement mechanisms<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n        <h2>Market Growth and Investment Trends<\/h2>\n\n        <p>The plagiarism detection software market has experienced unprecedented growth, driven by the AI revolution in education:<\/p>\n\n        <div class=\"chart-container\">\n            <h3>Plagiarism Detection Market Growth Projections<\/h3>\n            <canvas id=\"marketGrowthChart\" width=\"400\" height=\"200\"><\/canvas>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <ul>\n            <li>Market size valued at USD 1.2 billion in 2024<\/li>\n            <li>Projected to reach USD 3.0 billion by 2033<\/li>\n            <li>Annual growth rate of 10.5% from 2026 to 2033<\/li>\n            <li>North America holds 40% market share, followed by Asia Pacific at 25%<\/li>\n        <\/ul>\n\n        <h2>Academic Integrity Policies and Enforcement<\/h2>\n\n        <p>Institutions are rapidly developing comprehensive policies to address AI usage in academic work. These policies range from complete prohibition to guided integration, with <a href=\"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/standardized-test-scores-vs-term%e2%80%91end-gpa\/\" class=\"internal-link\">varying impacts on student performance metrics<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n        <div class=\"stats-grid\">\n            <div class=\"stat-card\">\n                <div class=\"stat-number\">64%<\/div>\n                <div class=\"stat-label\">Student discipline rates for AI-related plagiarism (2024)<\/div>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"stat-card\">\n                <div class=\"stat-number\">51%<\/div>\n                <div class=\"stat-label\">Students would continue using AI despite bans<\/div>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"stat-card\">\n                <div class=\"stat-number\">70%<\/div>\n                <div class=\"stat-label\">Educators consider AI use as plagiarism<\/div>\n            <\/div>\n            <div class=\"stat-card\">\n                <div class=\"stat-number\">3%<\/div>\n                <div class=\"stat-label\">Assignments generated mostly by AI<\/div>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <h2>Emerging Detection Technologies<\/h2>\n\n        <p>Beyond traditional text analysis, innovative approaches like keystroke dynamics are showing promise in academic integrity monitoring:<\/p>\n\n        <table class=\"comparison-table\">\n            <thead>\n                <tr>\n                    <th>Detection Method<\/th>\n                    <th>Accuracy Rate<\/th>\n                    <th>Implementation Status<\/th>\n                    <th>Key Advantages<\/th>\n                <\/tr>\n            <\/thead>\n            <tbody>\n                <tr>\n                    <td>Keystroke Dynamics<\/td>\n                    <td>99%<\/td>\n                    <td>Pilot Testing<\/td>\n                    <td>Reduces bias, real-time monitoring<\/td>\n                <\/tr>\n                <tr>\n                    <td>Multi-modal Detection<\/td>\n                    <td>85-95%<\/td>\n                    <td>Development Phase<\/td>\n                    <td>Comprehensive analysis approach<\/td>\n                <\/tr>\n                <tr>\n                    <td>Behavioral Analytics<\/td>\n                    <td>75-85%<\/td>\n                    <td>Early Research<\/td>\n                    <td>Pattern recognition capabilities<\/td>\n                <\/tr>\n            <\/tbody>\n        <\/table>\n\n        <h2>Impact on Different Student Demographics<\/h2>\n\n        <p>Research reveals that AI usage patterns and their academic impacts vary significantly across different student populations. <a href=\"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/income-bracket-and-gpa-correlation\/\" class=\"internal-link\">Students from varying socioeconomic backgrounds<\/a> show different adoption rates and consequences:<\/p>\n\n        <ul>\n            <li>Business majors report highest AI usage (62%) compared to humanities (52%)<\/li>\n            <li>Male students more likely to use AI tools (64% vs 48% for female students)<\/li>\n            <li>STEM fields show 59% usage rates, falling between business and humanities<\/li>\n            <li><a href=\"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/club-participation-vs-gpa\/\" class=\"internal-link\">Students involved in extracurricular activities<\/a> show more responsible AI usage patterns<\/li>\n        <\/ul>\n\n        <h2>Geographic Trends and Cultural Factors<\/h2>\n\n        <p>Different regions exhibit varying patterns of AI adoption and detection in academic settings. These differences often reflect cultural attitudes toward technology and academic integrity:<\/p>\n\n        <div class=\"chart-container\">\n            <h3>Global AI Usage in Academic Settings by Region<\/h3>\n            <canvas id=\"regionalChart\" width=\"400\" height=\"200\"><\/canvas>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <p>The United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom report the highest rates of AI-generated content detection, while regions like South Africa show distinct patterns influenced by local academic practices and resource availability.<\/p>\n\n        <h2>Institutional Response Strategies<\/h2>\n\n        <p>Educational institutions are implementing diverse strategies to address AI-related challenges while maintaining academic integrity. These approaches range from technological solutions to pedagogical reforms:<\/p>\n\n        <div class=\"insight-box\">\n            <strong>Emerging Trend:<\/strong> Rather than focusing solely on detection, institutions are shifting toward transparency and guided AI usage policies that teach students appropriate integration of AI tools in their learning process.\n        <\/div>\n\n        <p>Forward-thinking institutions are also examining how <a href=\"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/top-100-universities-gpa-benchmark\/\" class=\"internal-link\">top-tier universities maintain academic standards<\/a> while adapting to technological changes. This includes revising assessment methods, implementing authentic evaluation techniques, and providing clear guidelines for acceptable AI assistance.<\/p>\n\n        <h2>Long-term Academic Implications<\/h2>\n\n        <p>The integration of AI detection systems into academic environments has far-reaching implications beyond immediate plagiarism detection:<\/p>\n\n        <ul>\n            <li>Potential impact on student creativity and critical thinking development<\/li>\n            <li>Changes in how <a href=\"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/merit-based-vs-need-based-scholarships\/\" class=\"internal-link\">academic merit is evaluated for scholarships<\/a><\/li>\n            <li>Evolution of assessment methodologies to accommodate AI presence<\/li>\n            <li>Influence on college admissions and graduate school applications<\/li>\n        <\/ul>\n\n        <h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n        <h3 onclick=\"toggleFAQ('faq1')\">How much does AI usage actually impact student GPA?<\/h3>\n        <div id=\"faq1\" class=\"faq-content\">\n            <p>Research demonstrates that students using generative AI tools score an average of 6.71 points lower on a 100-point scale compared to non-users. This impact is particularly pronounced among high-achieving students, suggesting that AI dependency may interfere with natural learning processes and skill development.<\/p>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <h3 onclick=\"toggleFAQ('faq2')\">Which AI detection tools are most accurate?<\/h3>\n        <div id=\"faq2\" class=\"faq-content\">\n            <p>Copyleaks and GPTZero currently demonstrate the highest accuracy rates, with both claiming 99% detection capability. However, independent testing shows varying results, with Copyleaks showing strong performance in multiple third-party evaluations. Turnitin, while widely used, has shown inconsistent results in independent assessments.<\/p>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <h3 onclick=\"toggleFAQ('faq3')\">Are AI detection tools biased against certain student populations?<\/h3>\n        <div id=\"faq3\" class=\"faq-content\">\n            <p>Yes, significant bias exists. Non-native English speakers face false-positive rates of up to 61.3%, compared to 7-20% for native speakers. This disparity raises serious equity concerns, particularly affecting international students and those from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Educational institutions must consider these biases when implementing detection policies.<\/p>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <h3 onclick=\"toggleFAQ('faq4')\">What percentage of students are actually using AI for academic work?<\/h3>\n        <div id=\"faq4\" class=\"faq-content\">\n            <p>Studies show varying rates: 56% of college students report using AI on assignments or exams, while 89% of students admit to using ChatGPT for homework. However, Turnitin&#8217;s analysis of over 200 million assignments found that only about 10% show some AI use, with just 3% being mostly AI-generated.<\/p>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <h3 onclick=\"toggleFAQ('faq5')\">How is the plagiarism detection market expected to grow?<\/h3>\n        <div id=\"faq5\" class=\"faq-content\">\n            <p>The anti-plagiarism software market is experiencing rapid growth, valued at USD 1.2 billion in 2024 and projected to reach USD 3.0 billion by 2033, with an annual growth rate of 10.5%. This growth is driven by increased AI adoption in education and the corresponding need for detection technologies.<\/p>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <h3 onclick=\"toggleFAQ('faq6')\">What new technologies are being developed for plagiarism detection?<\/h3>\n        <div id=\"faq6\" class=\"faq-content\">\n            <p>Emerging technologies include keystroke dynamics analysis, which achieves up to 99% accuracy in distinguishing human-written from AI-generated text. Multi-modal detection systems combining text analysis with behavioral patterns are also in development, potentially offering more comprehensive and less biased detection capabilities.<\/p>\n        <\/div>\n\n        <div class=\"citation\">\n            <h3>Citations<\/h3>\n            <ol>\n                <li>Wecks, J. O., et al. (2024). <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2404.19699\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Generative AI Usage and Exam Performance.&#8221;<\/a> arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19699.<\/li>\n                <li>Education Week. (2024). <a href=\"https:\/\/www.edweek.org\/technology\/new-data-reveal-how-many-students-are-using-ai-to-cheat\/2024\/04\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;New Data Reveal How Many Students Are Using AI to Cheat.&#8221;<\/a><\/li>\n                <li>ArtSmart AI. (2025). <a href=\"https:\/\/artsmart.ai\/blog\/ai-plagiarism-statistics\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;AI Plagiarism Statistics 2025: Transforming Academic Integrity.&#8221;<\/a><\/li>\n                <li>BestColleges. (2023). <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bestcolleges.com\/research\/most-college-students-have-used-ai-survey\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;56% of College Students Have Used AI on Assignments or Exams.&#8221;<\/a><\/li>\n                <li>Verified Market Reports. (2025). <a href=\"https:\/\/www.verifiedmarketreports.com\/product\/anti-plagiarism-software-market\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Anti-Plagiarism Software Market Size, Consumer Behavior &#038; Forecast.&#8221;<\/a><\/li>\n            <\/ol>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n<\/body>\n<\/html>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Claude in academic settings has triggered an unprecedented surge in AI-generated content submissions. This transformation has prompted educational institutions worldwide to deploy sophisticated AI-powered plagiarism detection systems, fundamentally altering how academic integrity is monitored and maintained. This comprehensive analysis examines the measurable impact of&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":384,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-382","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-statistics"],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":6,"label":"Statistics"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/AI\u2011Driven-Plagiarism-Detection-Effects-On-GPA-2025-683x1024.png",683,1024,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"gpa_calculate_tools","author_link":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/author\/gpa_calculate_tools\/"},"comment_info":0,"category_info":[{"term_id":6,"name":"Statistics","slug":"statistics","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":6,"taxonomy":"category","description":"","parent":0,"count":26,"filter":"raw","cat_ID":6,"category_count":26,"category_description":"","cat_name":"Statistics","category_nicename":"statistics","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=382"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":387,"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382\/revisions\/387"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=382"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=382"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gpacalculate.com\/statistics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=382"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}